Re: VMs: Re: Important

["Jeff" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Are you still of the opinion that is in English? I think the date of 1538
might be a little early. In my opinion the century is right though. I know
most people on the list would probably disagree, but I believe you are
getting nearer the pizza.

Jeff

GC gc-@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote


> Jeff wrote:
>
> > I would agree 100% with your last remark. The VMS changed as the
> > construction progressed. How long a period do you assume the writing
> > took?
>
> Any comment on how long a period the writing lasted would be speculation
at
> this point.  I only have one date so far, and that is 1538.  I'm seriously
> questioning if I have the book associated with the right author, because
if
> I don't, my suspected timeline would be meaningless.  If I do have it
> associated with the right author, that would place its construction along
> the lines of at least 12 years, maybe more.  I'm hoping f1r will clear
this
> up a bit.
>
> GC


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list