Re: VMs: f67v-?-?-f68r

[Rene Zandbergen <r_zandbergen@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- Ken W <ken@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I feel like this is going to be a continuing
> question session as I 
> continue my trudging.  So, pardon my constant
> postings if all this is 
> redundant...
> 
> Has it been mentioned before that there are clearly
> two folios missing 
> between f67v1 and f68r1? (see: MrSID of folio
> f67v2/f67v1)

It has been mentioned that in some place there
are 'stubs' visible between consecutively numbered
pages. I don't know if it was here, but it seems
likely.
Jim Reeds also mentioned that the 'stub' of 
f74 actually consists of a pair of stubs. He
did not dare to conclude that there were actually
two pages cut out there (since it would result
in an odd number of folios) but thought that it
could be an artefact of the (re-)binding of this
quire. 

It can only be decided by someone having a 
very close look at the binding here.

Note that this is a quire with only one
bifolio, but (apparently) not a double foldout
like the rosettes one.

Your observation does add to the mystery of the 
quire 9 binding.

Cheers, Rene


		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list