Re: VMs: f58v to f65r transition

[Ken W <ken@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Nick Pelling wrote:

> Are you able to eliminate scanning artefacts? If one was photographed 
> at the end of one day and the next at the start of the next, you might 
> get appreciable differences between the two. FWIW, the file creation 
> dates in the metadata are less than two minutes apart, so I suspect 
> that they probably refer to the time of the compression, not the time 
> of the scanning. :-o

I'm not sure which artifacts you are referring to.  So far, through 68 
folios (I'm dying for MrSIDs of the 68rs!), there have only been two 
which needed any correction (just a tweak in brightness).  No gamma 
corrections needed so far.  Most of what I've been doing is scale, 
rotation and alignment so that each folio is precisely registered.  
Primarily I'm using the GC Binding Alignment Technique (c) to align the 
recto to the verso with the Pelling Stain Alignment Method (c) for 
double accuracy. ;-)  The following verso is registered via a tedious 
Flickering Transparency/Pelling Stain hybrid.  That's it really.  Given 
the quality of the images, I'm avoiding any unnecessary image 
enhancement.  My main goal is to create a printable - or simply viewable 
- recreation of the physical MS.

Ken


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list