Re: VMs: f58v to f65r transition

[Nick Pelling <incoming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Ken,

At 13:19 30/06/2004 -0500, Ken W wrote:
> I'm not sure which artifacts you are referring to.

Really, just gamma/brightness/contrast: if (like these two) you're 
comparing pages with different types of content (text vs herbal), you may 
get different kinds of scans being output. BTW, have you looked at these in 
the noip scans as well?

>   So far, through 68 folios (I'm dying for MrSIDs of the 68rs!), there 
> have only been two which needed any correction (just a tweak in 
> brightness).  No gamma corrections needed so far.  Most of what I've been 
> doing is scale, rotation and alignment so that each folio is precisely 
> registered.
> Primarily I'm using the GC Binding Alignment Technique (c) to align the 
> recto to the verso with the Pelling Stain Alignment Method (c) for double 
> accuracy. ;-)  The following verso is registered via a tedious Flickering 
> Transparency/Pelling Stain hybrid.

Be careful - it's not yet 100% established that all the bleed-across 
instances register with the current binding. For example, I wouldn't be at 
all surprised if the f2v bleed-across (which seems to be from the original 
line drawing) registers with the original binding, and not with the 
rebinding which we (perhaps) see now. There's also mention of a possible 
later (Jesuit) rebinding - yet another spanner in the works to contend 
with. :-o

Cheers, .....Nick Pelling.....

PS: as for being "Stain Master"... well, I guess I have been called worse 
in anger... :-) 


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list