[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: VMs: Re: Re: Inks and retouching



Folks, if you do not know what a "wame" word is, you will just have to look it up. Ciao ......... KM

Knox Mix wrote:

Nick Pelling wrote:


But hold on a minute: look again at the top line of the same page, and you should see some very unVoynichese Voynichese going on. Words three and four (EVA <qotoa sha>) break most of the structure rules we're used to (no word-final a's, etc) - and in fact, I think you can see a faint tail on the sidfile beneath the first word-final <a>, where the original word was <qotoy>.


I have not followed this thread but looked at the word you mention. No doubt about the "y". Surprisingly, the tail can be seen on the jpg about as well as it can on the sid.

The "q" of the wame word is interesting in that the uniformly broad vertical downstroke differs from the original writing. The consistent execution of rapid endstrokes with regular taper shows a very skilled hand that reduces pressure evenly as the stroke is made until the pen is lifted. At least those strokes been very well done on the few pages I have looked at. It might even be difficult for an original writer to do repeatedly with certainty from a "cold" start, as in retouching. However, I believe the original writer could do better than this. Note the word directly below in which the retouch went a little farther than it should.

Elsewhere, it is difficult to imagine that chemical action (or microbes) singled out entire tailless letters without affecting letters to either side. If it generally left the tails because of original thiness of ink I suppose there could be a threshold effect to explain the abrupt change from broad, uniformly dark stroke to tapering stroke. I favor the idea that attempts were seldom made to re-cover the tails because it could not be done properly. I am not overlooking the probability that ink on ink does not behave in the same manner as ink on vellum. The first application goes into the scratch so tends not to smear. Ink, I believe, was selected for its penetrating or etching quality. I leave that to someone who knows along with the effects of 500 years. I do see effects of only a few years of exposure on paper, ink, and paint. Although the environment could not be duplicated, other manuscripts for comparison would be helpful.

[snip]

Knox
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list