VMs: Re: Re: Past reordering of the manuscript

["john stojko" <oko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I do agree.
If one can read one paragraph and understand what is written, one can read
the
whole page or book.

John


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jacques Guy" <jguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 4:02 AM
Subject: VMs: Re: Past reordering of the manuscript


> 14/08/2004 6:34:14 AM, "John Grove" <John@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> >  There have been numerous discussions about page order of the years and
> >although a few of us are more convinced about some portions, like
> everything
> >else in the VMS - you find ample room for disagreement about the
> >observations made.
>
> It does not matter for the decipherment. Take an Old Testament, a version
> in a language you do not know (will Hebrew do?). Change the order of
> the verses to your heart's content. Each verse can still be deciphered.
> Take the Koran now. The surats are sorted in order of decreasing length,
> so that they do not follow logically from one another. Does that make
> it unreadable? No. Each surat is a whole. Each page of the VMs can be
> considered as a whole. In the case of the herbal, and the pharmaceutical
> section, it IS a whole. Shuffle the folios to your heart's content,
> it won't make a difference for the decipherment.
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
> unsubscribe vms-list

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list