[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMs: Stroke harmony. Was: Has anyone been down this route before?
3/09/2004 3:45:27 AM, Pamela Richards <spirlhelix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>to further complicate
>matters, we use "glyph" to mean a single character
>that stands for a planet or other astrological
No conflict there. The conflicts arise with "graph"
which, as I've already written, immediately conjures
up "graph" as in "graph theory" or "graph" as in
"graph paper". On the other hand, there is no
fundamental difference when you speak of the
(astrological) glyph for "Jupiter", or that for
"quincunx", or of the (Mayan) glyph for "jaguar", or
for the syllable "ba". "Graph" gets really bad
when it leads you to "graphology", which should
make you think of "phonology". But everybody
will think, instead, of the theory that handwriting
So that's why in the article I'm writing I have
settled on glyph, alloglyph, glypheme.
Further, consider how we say "digraph" for
sequences of two letters forming a single whole,
e.g. "th" in English, "gn" in French. And
"trigraphs", e.g. German "sch". Now what would
you call all the rest, those composed of only
ONE letter? Monographs?
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: