RE: VMs: Wired Rugg...

["Philip Neal" <philipneal_vms@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: Nick Pelling <nickpelling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Text of Gordon Rugg's Wired article (link courtesy of GC):-
> 	http://www.rense.com/general57/theman.htm

It is plain that the site www.rense.com is not to be taken seriously but at 
the foot of the page is a link

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.09/rugg.html?tw=wn_tophead_6

to what looks like a fuller version of the article.

For the record, since I seem to be the only list member mentioned in the 
article, the words attributed to me are accurately quoted from an email from 
me to Joseph d'Agnese. (The flattering characterisation of me is not a 
quotation.) However, that email consisted of seven paragraphs of 
considerations counting for and against the Rugg theory. It ended:

"In summary, Rugg's paper is a well argued, knowledgeable piece of work 
which may well be the answer to the puzzle, but it is not quite conclusive 
and may not be the last word on the matter."

I have made it clear to Gordon Rugg that I endorse his theory only in the 
sense that I think it is logically possible and I hope that this is clear to 
list members as well.

Philip Neal

_________________________________________________________________
Stay in touch with absent friends - get MSN Messenger 
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list