[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: VMs: Wired Rugg...
From: Nick Pelling <nickpelling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Text of Gordon Rugg's Wired article (link courtesy of GC):-
It is plain that the site www.rense.com is not to be taken seriously but at
the foot of the page is a link
to what looks like a fuller version of the article.
For the record, since I seem to be the only list member mentioned in the
article, the words attributed to me are accurately quoted from an email from
me to Joseph d'Agnese. (The flattering characterisation of me is not a
quotation.) However, that email consisted of seven paragraphs of
considerations counting for and against the Rugg theory. It ended:
"In summary, Rugg's paper is a well argued, knowledgeable piece of work
which may well be the answer to the puzzle, but it is not quite conclusive
and may not be the last word on the matter."
I have made it clear to Gordon Rugg that I endorse his theory only in the
sense that I think it is logically possible and I hope that this is clear to
list members as well.
Stay in touch with absent friends - get MSN Messenger
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: