VMs: Re: *****SPAM***** *****SPAM*****

[mesinik@xxxxxx]

Quoting Jacques Guy <jguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 25/02/2005 2:26:58 PM, mesinik@xxxxxx wrote:
> >But could you be a little bit more specific? Have you tested it with some
> >of the Tataric dialects? Any opinions about mixed Tataric/Mongolian/maybe
> > more? 

> Can't be, unless it is a very strange cipher.

I just asked for a link ... maybe I agree, if the maths are staying in touch
with real world ... could you please give this link, if you have it?

the "worst" about VMS is, it looks "real", ie. 500 years old. Also it looks
containing what you just called "a very strange cipher", ie. too much crypto for
such an old thing. So, it is "legal" to ask ... what if it is not old? If it is
not encrypted? Is such a question spam? IMO it also looks Central Asian, not
just European. Many contradictory questions could be asked about the VMS.

> then... but no, the only languages that fit are the monosyllabic
> languages of the Far East: Chinese, Vietnamese, Tibetan, as Jorge
> Stolfi has found out.

if I should choose now, I would take Tibetan. But somehow I feel it's "too easy".
One more thing: I told, this is a wild speculation. I think, it's okeey in this
list? Do you agree? I hope, it wasn't too disturbing for you?




-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list