Re: *****SPAM***** Re: *****SPAM***** VMs: speculating with "dairal"

[mesinik@xxxxxx]

On the road "if it's old, then it's probably plaintext":

Quoting Jacques Guy <jguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> You could argue that Voynichese has what I called here "stroke
> harmony" and that, since Mongolian has vowel and consonant harmony,
> then... but no, the only languages that fit are the monosyllabic
> languages of the Far East: Chinese, Vietnamese, Tibetan, as Jorge
> Stolfi has found out.

if (at least the words are) phonetical & 
plaintext, so it could be some strange mix.

to try an easy answer (directly connected
with "astrological coins" of the Moghul Empire)
.. was there any Sino-Tibetian people?

More speculations: Mongolian-Chinese
(since Chinese doesn't have too much grammar,
so could it be "mostly Chinese roots
peppered with a kind of Mongolian grammar?");
Tibetian_Bengali (okeey, right now I do not
know anymore, what I am telling about...). It
becomes pretty complex anyway. But about 1500,
Venezians operated from Alexandria, Egypt
afaik & Portugal was just ready to kick them
out of the silkroad game (so, poor times coming 
for Italia ...)

About Venezians in Egypt, did they have any
outposts in India? Probably yes in 1500, probably
no in 1515 or so ... am I wrong now?

-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list