[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: VMs: Re: Reasearching the VMs at Beinecke



Hello Steve,

In response to your question:

1. more

2. not older



Dana


From: steve ekwall <ekwall2@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: VMs: Re: Reasearching the VMs at Beinecke
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:11:10 -1000 (HST)



Dana Scott reported:
> I am currently researching the VMs and accompanying documents at the
> Beinecke Library. It is a wonderful experience to be able to examine the
> original incunabula. If anyone has a burning need for me to examine a
> particular item, please do not hesitate to ask. I will be here next week
> as well.


Dana :-)

I suppose if an 'oddball question' needs to be asked, it should be
asked by the list resident 'oddball' here, me :-)

1:
IF you are 'physically' 'holding/looking/study'ing the original does
it have the same ~mystical drawing one inward~ properties as the copy
we see on-line? (more, less, equal?)

2:
Now that you are there, do you think IT could be ~OLDER?~ than we have
been debating?

all the above is of course _non-scientific_ and of little value, but
just asking your personal observations.

Best of luck with all you *SEE* and *FEEL* there.

-=se=-
steve (ahh, to touch it just once? :-)) ekwall

p.s. is the map-page (rossette pg.)really that "detailed" ?

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list