[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: Re: D! II

Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:41:54 -0500
To: Dennis <ixohoxi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Big Jim <bigjim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: D!  II

At 12:16 PM 2/19/01 -0600, you wrote:
Dark MaP wrote:
> If the V-words ('voynichese words') are really the syllables... don't you
> think the entire (plain) text will be considerely short, so short that be
> ridicoulous if the theme is alchemy and related sciences???

This is why I had said there is no sentence structure and paraphrase is necessary to make sentences out of a list of words that follow a main theme. This is why I was told there far too many words in my translation compared to Voynich words.
The main theme revolves around "the eye", which was seen and recorded by the ancients and involves mankind's last destruction. It is impossible to create the text without knowing the main theme. This is why you keep telling me about the "other" possible definitions of words. I am very aware of this. But when I read about the "blue eye" and the "cyclical eye" and definitions of destruction...you tell me what I am supposed to think. The error lies with me. I am not explaining myself well enough. Let's start simply.



--------------------------------------------------------------- The End is near....Something plural this way comes. Have a nice day :-)