RE: VMs: RE: a and b

[Rene Zandbergen <r_zandbergen@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- GC <glenclaston@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Nick wrote:
> 
> > This certainly sounds suggestive of the
> > f1r-as-contents-page-(one-para-per-section)
> hypothesis [...]
> 
> This has been my view of this page, since it fits
> for European manuscripts,
> and because the act of adding to this page does
> indeed indicate that these
> are contents or definitions of the various sections.

GC, by the time you get to transcribing f58r/v,
I'd very much like to hear your opinion about
its possible relation to the stars section (ff.
103-116). Also, its possible relation to the 
VMS words which are on the third line of the
"key page" f116v.
The entire quire in which it is collated looks
either like another summary, or as if it has been
put together from leftover folios.

Cheers, Rene

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list