[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: VMs: A Comment on f67r2



Thank you for setting this straight Rafal.
 
Regards,
Dana Scott
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: VMs: A Comment on f67r2

"Robert Teague" <rteague@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> While the Codex Taurinensis was subjected to fire damage,
> a portion of the text may still be available for reference?
> Does the following URL refer to the same
> manuscript being discussed here?

No, this and the other link point to information on other
manuscripts from the Tourin National Library (biblical texts).

"Our" manuscript has these call numbers (per Rene's info from
Boll's book):

   Codex Taurinensis C VII 15 (CCAG IV cod. 5)

BTW: I have come across this site:

  http://www.cieloeterra.it/index.html

which has a nice bibliography of ancient astrology, including:

    Catalogus Codicum Astrologorum Graecorum (20 volumina),
    Bruxellis 1898-1953 (CCAG)

which is obviously the reference on Rene's page.
Is this the Boll book? Is it illustrated? Has anyone seen it?

Best regards,

Rafal
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list