[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: VMs: 1006184 & 1006185



Hi

Can you give me some urls for older herbal piccies?

Vines - yes, to be sure - but not all wiped out (cf Chile). And I'd bet that a Roman would recognize current vines as indeed vines.

William


On 9 Jun 2004, at 15:01, Larry Roux wrote:


Instead of looking at real life examples you should troll the web and look at herbals from the timeframe. They rarely look much like the plants being depicted.

As for changes over 500 years, in many cases you are correct, but there are certainly a lot of examples of species of plants being changed/overrun over that timeframe. Heck, the grape plants in France are all less than 100 years old - and all come from California and other countries after the entire group of French vines was wiped out.




Larry Roux Syracuse University lroux@xxxxxxx


w.h.edmondson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 06/09/04 09:45AM >>>
Hi

That is fine - but can these experts also offer us some descriptions of
how the illustrations differ from the plants 'depicted'?  If we had
that then we'd know more about what allowances to make wrt the VMS
illustrations.

Please don't misunderstand me.  I'm simply concerned to clarify the
basis on which people can say of any VMS illustration that it 'is of
plant xxxxx'.  Currently I'm underwhelmed by any of the suggestions
offered, and really bothered that I can stroll into my garden to check
(and look in piles of books I have to support the gardening) and find
many many important taxonomical differences.  If folk can genuinely
explain away those differences then let's hear about it.

On the face of it the possibility that plants evolved a lot over 500
years seems implausible.  That drawings might be
systematically/stylistically 'erroneous' is interesting but I need the
evidence.

That's all.

William


On 9 Jun 2004, at 12:37, Rene Zandbergen wrote:



--- William Edmondson <w.h.edmondson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi

The point I am trying to make (non-tetchily) is
simply that 'looks-like'
is very subjective.  The drawing in question doesn't
look like a
strawberry plant - any strawberry plant - for a
number of reasons I  listed.

It being subjective is true, but the real problem is even worse. It was never really the purpose of ME MS herbals to create lookalikes of the plants, so the same objection could be applied to a great many ME herbal drawings which are known to represent a particular plant (the text being readable). I'm not a medieval herbal expert, but the above statement comes not from me, but from people who are (were).

Cheers, Rene


__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: unsubscribe vms-list


Dr William Edmondson
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
Edgbaston B15 2TT
UK

Voice: +44-121-414-4763
email: w.h.edmondson@xxxxxxxxxx

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list


Dr William Edmondson
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
Edgbaston B15 2TT
UK

Voice: +44-121-414-4763
email: w.h.edmondson@xxxxxxxxxx

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list