Re: VMs: Modern Astrology vs. Traditional Astrology

[Rene Zandbergen <r_zandbergen@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear all,

--- Pamela Richards <spirlhelix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[major snipping here]

> And as for those who claim Ficino as the first
> "modern
> psychological" astrologer, I believe they have no
> idea
> what they are saying about the actual practice of
> astrology, and are reading "trends in astrology"
> backwards from Jung.  Jung dabbled in alchemy, after
> all. . .

Maybe you did not mean to write it the way this
sounds. Is anyone interested in alchemy disqualified
as being "serious" enough to discuss astrology?

To me, alchemy is a precursor to chemistry and
physics as we now know it, and astrology is 
a precursor to astronomy as we now know it.

I could go on about this, but will not, since possibly
I misunderstood what you wrote.

As regards Elmar Vogt's comments: yes, astrology
is totally relevant to the Voynich MS, and this 
is an unmoderated list, but I also got the impression
that the discussion was digressing a bit. I had
in fact stopped reading these E-mails until a new
name (Elmar's) appeared with the same subject
line :-)

Cheers, Rene


		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list