[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMs: Modern Astrology vs. Traditional Astrology
--- Pamela Richards <spirlhelix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[major snipping here]
> And as for those who claim Ficino as the first
> psychological" astrologer, I believe they have no
> what they are saying about the actual practice of
> astrology, and are reading "trends in astrology"
> backwards from Jung. Jung dabbled in alchemy, after
> all. . .
Maybe you did not mean to write it the way this
sounds. Is anyone interested in alchemy disqualified
as being "serious" enough to discuss astrology?
To me, alchemy is a precursor to chemistry and
physics as we now know it, and astrology is
a precursor to astronomy as we now know it.
I could go on about this, but will not, since possibly
I misunderstood what you wrote.
As regards Elmar Vogt's comments: yes, astrology
is totally relevant to the Voynich MS, and this
is an unmoderated list, but I also got the impression
that the discussion was digressing a bit. I had
in fact stopped reading these E-mails until a new
name (Elmar's) appeared with the same subject
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: