Re: VMs: Reasearching the VMs at Beinecke

["GC" <gc-@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dana, I do seem to remember in the herbal section that we have one or two "bleed across" images that do not match existing folios, which would suggest that there are herbal pages missing besides f12. Did you gain any sense of this in your examination?

GC
  
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "DANA SCOTT" <dscott520@xxxxxxx>
To: <vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 12:47 PM
Subject: RE: VMs: Reasearching the VMs at Beinecke


> Hi Jean,
> 
> A quick answer to the missing 12 pages, for example, is that they might not 
> be missing at all since they may never have existed to begin with.  Sure, if 
> we go by the numbers then one could say that they must be missing.  But the 
> current folios 58v and 65r are on the same piece of vellum and perhaps there 
> never were any additional folios inserted between.  Two reasons why this 
> came to mind are that the number 66 at the top of the rightmost folio which 
> follows the missing set might actually be a forged 55 (it kind of looks like 
> the 6 may actually have been penned originally as a 5 and turned into a 6 
> with an added stroke).  The second thought is that I saw no evidence of 
> there having been any insertions added between folios 58v and 65r.  Who 
> knows?  I will keep looking for evidence of these missing folios.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Dana Scott
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >From: jean-yves artero <jyartero@xxxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: RE: VMs: Reasearching the VMs at Beinecke
> >Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:45:45 +0200 (CEST)
> >
> >Hi Dana
> >
> >Thanks for the kind proposal.
> >
> >Perhaps an idea would be to get an impression about
> >the missing pages; it is easier I think when you have
> >a paper version in front of you; one question for
> >instance could be: is there any logic in the missings
> >and if yes what is this logic, as you see it?
> >
> >Of course a bigger one and more difficult but once
> >again better to ask oneself in the library is : what
> >is your overall impression about the logic of VMS as
> >it is now...
> >
> >Jean
> >
> >--- DANA SCOTT <dscott520@xxxxxxx> a écrit :
> >
> > >
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > I am currently researching the VMs and accompanying
> > > documents at the
> > > Beinecke Library.  It is a wonderful experience to
> > > be able to examine the
> > > original incunabula.  If anyone has a burning need
> > > for me to examine a
> > > particular item, please do not hesitate to ask.  I
> > > will be here next week as
> > > well.
> > >
> > >
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > Dana Scott
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >______________________________________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > with a body saying:
> > > unsubscribe vms-list
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >___________________________________________________________________________
> >Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger
> >Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
> >______________________________________________________________________
> >To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
> >unsubscribe vms-list
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
> unsubscribe vms-list
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list