VMs: Re: One real advantage IMHO....

["Francois Almaleh" <francois.almaleh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,
I read almost messages in this VMS list even if I post too few messages...
For Rene : I don't think the quality of these images change anything in the
structure of the research. All the members know the images and the text. As
all have a better definition, the result is the same : the writing is
unknown !. For exampe, if the motor of your car is dirty, you could drive
your drive as easily as the motor is clean.

I continue to think that a good research be very structured. The wiki can be
a solution, a bbs another...
At this time, all the members of this list are working with the same basis,
and nothing : no serious solution. Sorry for the word "nothing" but it's a
truth that the messages in this mailing-list are like a "phone directory" :
a lot of names, alphabets, images, comparisons, writings...
The VMS can't be "universal" or encyclopedic.

A first good approach could be to create several groups of 5 members about 5
or 6 main themes : images, texts, symbols, cipher...
Each group would work one or two months and explain to others their results.

Just an idea.
Regards,
Francois Almaleh



>
> A major advantage from the work done by the
> Beinecke is that, perhaps for the first time
> in the history of the list, we all have
> exactly the same, clear, picture of the VMs
> and we can all talk about the same thing.
>
> Cheers, Rene


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list