Re: VMs: In the news again...

[Gabriel Landini <G.Landini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Monday 26 January 2004 14:59, elvogt@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I'm not sure that we have proof Kelley knew about CGs, but CGs were around
> at his time, so it can be reasonably assumed someone interested in
> cryptography would have known.

It is possible, but then this is like saying that Kelley is 'reasonably 
guilty' until proven innocent. Is he?

Forget about colour copies, we desperately need a time machine. :-)
Or, cheaper, some ink analysis. That could rule Dee/Kelley out if the inks are 
not from their period. 

I wonder how robust the ink analysis is considering the amount of 
contamination that the ms may have.

Cheers,

Gabriel (who wonders whether word-starting <y> and word-ending <y> are 
different abbreviations).


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list